View Single Post
Old 01-03-2006, 05:35 AM   #7 (permalink)
mulroony
 
mulroony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 2,100
Rep Power: 121 mulroony user is more repute than ever in the dog forummulroony user is more repute than ever in the dog forummulroony user is more repute than ever in the dog forummulroony user is more repute than ever in the dog forummulroony user is more repute than ever in the dog forummulroony user is more repute than ever in the dog forum
Send a message via AIM to mulroony
Novel - The designer dog issue had not crossed my mind in this arguement. I think for 95% of people getting designer dogs the fact that the parents are AKC registered is enough validity for them, and I think having these dogs grouped by the AKC in the same category as any other mutts might take some steam out of them.

I was not thinking that the AKC would be more involved in checking the validity of its memberships if it expanded, but rather loosen up its admitance with new classifications maybe. I just think the AKC openning up like this would make it a lot easier to track breeding more accurately so we could better find a solution to pet overpopulation. I see it as allowing us to better visualize the major problem regions that are creating lots more pets then are homes available so those areas can be targeted w/ greater education.

I know I am also one of many mixed owners who wishes they knew more about the history and lines of their dogs. I am not asking to brag about being part of the AKC or doing any shows or anything like that, I would like to know lineage of my pups though, which is rarely possible for mixed breeds currently. I wish I could find out who my pups parents were to ask their owners if there are any genetic disorders I should be watching for. Heck I would just like to know what breeds my Shelby is...
__________________
Shelby (CGC), Jackson, Max, & Mackenzie (CGC) - My pups :)

Pit Bull "Problem" Movie (Graphic)
mulroony is offline   Reply With Quote