View Single Post
Old 02-10-2007, 03:55 AM   #8 (permalink)
Rivsky
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
 
Rivsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Australia
Posts: 3,774
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 141 Rivsky user is more repute than ever in the dog forumRivsky user is more repute than ever in the dog forumRivsky user is more repute than ever in the dog forumRivsky user is more repute than ever in the dog forumRivsky user is more repute than ever in the dog forumRivsky user is more repute than ever in the dog forumRivsky user is more repute than ever in the dog forumRivsky user is more repute than ever in the dog forumRivsky user is more repute than ever in the dog forumRivsky user is more repute than ever in the dog forum
Send a message via MSN to Rivsky Send a message via Yahoo to Rivsky
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassiepeia
A 'real' fence would offer far better protection for your animals. Should your animals manage to get outside the fence line the shock would possibly stop them from coming back in. It also offers no protection against other animals or people coming onto your property. Both of which can harm your dogs.
Should the battery go dead before you get to change it, your dogs are no longer protected from the road.

Erecting a real fence is far more secure and sensible then expecting an electric shock to protect your dogs from danger.

Cass.
I totally agree - so many things can still go wrong just relying on a collar.
__________________


As a member of Global paw staff my opinions are not necessarily those of the website or the owner.
Rivsky is offline   Reply With Quote