View Single Post
Old 09-05-2005, 12:00 PM   #10 (permalink)
tessa_s212
agility addict
 
tessa_s212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Stryker, Ohio
Posts: 627
Rep Power: 73 tessa_s212 User is simply amazing in the dog forumtessa_s212 User is simply amazing in the dog forumtessa_s212 User is simply amazing in the dog forumtessa_s212 User is simply amazing in the dog forum
Send a message via AIM to tessa_s212 Send a message via MSN to tessa_s212 Send a message via Yahoo to tessa_s212
-

Sayuri--You do realize that that was a quote, right?

I did not say that. I don't agree with this person's prejudice and generalizations, but I do agree with the fact that breeders that breed for conformation only breed the working ability out of a breed.

Ideally, I believe a breeder should breed for both, while still focusing on the working aspect side of it. (Of course, not all breeds can continue to do what they were originally bred to do. ) I believe a good breeder first focuses on health and temperment, then working ability. A good working dog probably isn't terribly cowhocked, so I beleive working ability intermixes with conformation or soundness. I believe a breeder should breed for conformation, or soundness, equally to working ability.

Last edited by tessa_s212 : 09-05-2005 at 05:49 PM.
tessa_s212 is offline   Reply With Quote