Punkygirl. I love your posts. They show your intense compassion and intelligence that you have with your dogs. I just wanted to catch something here. I know what you mean though.
Quote:
|
I am also not a believer in negative reinforcement.
|
I suspect you mean that you're not a believer in positive punishment....adding something nasty to the dog; hitting, stomping, scolding etc. There is soooo much fall out and bad, bad side effects to a lot of punishment.
Negative reinforcement is used a lot by "positive reinforcement" type trainers. Negative reinforcement means that you're taking away (subtracting) something the dog likes from his environment....like say, dog pulls on the leash. You stop and stand still, taking away the forward movement that he was enjoying. It's a way for them to learn which in a way is "punishing" but there is less wear and tear and fewer ill side effects. It is something that assists with the dog's learning. When he gives you slack in the leash, you add positive reinforcment again by resuming the walking again. (the thing he wants to do)
Negative.... when you're talking about dog training doesn't mean bad. It means subtracting or taking away. Positive means adding something. Reinforcement increases behavior. Punishment decreases behavior. So, positive reinforcement is adding something that increases behavior, (raises the liklihood of it repeating in the future). Positive punishment is adding something that decreases behavior.
Negative reinforcement is removing or subtracting the good thing in order to increase the behavior you want. Negative punishment is removing a punisher which is already existing. For instance, a choke collar is tightening steadily on a dog's neck. Now you release it and give the poor dog a break. That's negative punishment. The punisher, the painful thing stopped.
Anyhow, you're so right that attacking dogs teaches them nothing except to fear humans. They ARE animals after all and do not have human brains with human cognitive powers.