Globalpaw.com Dog Forum  

Go Back   Globalpaw.com Dog Forum > General Discussion > Dog News and Dogs in Popular Media
Register Blogs Forum Rules Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Dog News and Dogs in Popular Media Dog News Articles, Dog News on YouTube, Dog Magazines, Dog Radio Shows, Dog Movies, Dog Shows on TV, Dogs in the News

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-01-2006, 11:37 AM   #1 (permalink)
Giant Schnauzers
 
bigdoglover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: West-Central Illinois
Posts: 3,624
Rep Power: 173 bigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forum
Send a message via Yahoo to bigdoglover
New Jersey Bill Bad News for Breeders

American Kennel Club News Article

Assemblyman Neil Cohen has introduced Assembly Bill 3401, a bill which threatens the rights of responsible breeders in the state of New Jersey. Fanciers, concerned dog owners and responsible breeders should immediately contact their representatives in the New Jersey State Legislature and oppose this bill.

The bill defines a “breeder” as any person who sells or offers for sale more than 5 puppies per year. In addition to this incredibly low threshold, the bill requires breeders to comply with a host of restrictive regulations and institutes steep fines for violations. A3401 prohibits any breeder from selling more than 25 dogs in one year.

AKC opposes A3401’s attempt to effectively outlaw breeding in the state of New Jersey. Responsible breeders give the individual care and human contact that each puppy needs in order to grow into a healthy, well-adjusted companion and neighbor. Forcing responsible breeders out of business would deprive citizens of a very valuable resource when purchasing a pet.

The American Kennel Club believes that breeding programs should be undertaken responsibly for the purpose of preserving breed characteristics and producing healthy, well-socialized puppies. Responsible breeders are expected to give careful consideration to health issues, temperament, and genetic screening, as well as to the individual care and placement of puppies in responsible homes. AKC supports and promotes these and other responsible breeding practices through breeders’ education programs, and commends those who offer similar guidance.

The American Kennel Club opposes the concept of breeding permits, breeding bans or mandatory spay/neuter of purebred dogs. Instead, we support reasonable and enforceable laws that protect the welfare and health of purebred dogs and do not restrict the rights of breeders and owners who take their responsibilities seriously.

A3401 goes beyond encouraging responsible breeding. Under A3401, all breeders would be required to comply with draconian regulations including maintaining specified temperatures, keeping animals only on nonporous surfaces, and circulating air at precise intervals. The measure further mandates the acceptable dimensions for crates and runs and sets minimum socialization standards. Finally, all breeders are required to register annually with the Department of Health. This list will be published and made available to the public.

All breeders are required to furnish specified information to pet purchasers and provide a full refund for any reason for a pet returned within 14 days. Any dog which is sold with a pedigree can be returned for a full refund within 26 months if any congenital or genetic defects are discovered.

Violations can be punished with both monetary fines and suspension of the license to sell pets. A first violation can result in a prohibition on selling cats or dogs for 5 years and subsequent offenses can add an additional 5 years for each violation. Civil penalties may also be administered. For a first offense a breeder shall be fined $5,000 and for a second offense the breeder may be fined $10,000 for each subsequent offense. A member of the public who supplies information that results in fines or suspension will be eligible for an award of 10% of the civil penalty or $250, whichever is greater.

What You Can Do:

Contact your own Representatives and Senator to oppose A3401. To find out who represents you in the New Jersey State Assembly and State Senate, you can look up your city at: http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/
districts/municipalities.asp.
The New Jersey State Legislature is currently in recess, so most members are in their districts. Contact the district office and see if you or your dog club can set up a meeting with the legislator to talk about the importance of local, responsible breeders.
Contact Assemblyman Cohen and ask him to withdraw the bill from consideration.

Assemblyman Neil Cohen
State House Box 098
Trenton, NJ 08625-0098
Phone: 609/292-5339
Website: http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/members/cohen.asp

Watch AKC’s Web site for further updates. The bill has been referred to the Assembly Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee, but has not yet been set for a hearing. AKC will notify fanciers as soon as a hearing is scheduled.
__________________
Glory and Greed will destroy the breed.
bigdoglover is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 11:47 AM   #2 (permalink)
aka Red Dogs
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,221
Rep Power: 84 rmci User has done a lot of good in the dog forum in the past.rmci User has done a lot of good in the dog forum in the past.
Quote:
The bill defines a “breeder” as any person who sells or offers for sale more than 5 puppies per year. In addition to this incredibly low threshold, the bill requires breeders to comply with a host of restrictive regulations and institutes steep fines for violations. A3401 prohibits any breeder from selling more than 25 dogs in one year.

A3401 goes beyond encouraging responsible breeding. Under A3401, all breeders would be required to comply with draconian regulations including maintaining specified temperatures, keeping animals only on nonporous surfaces, and circulating air at precise intervals. The measure further mandates the acceptable dimensions for crates and runs and sets minimum socialization standards. Finally, all breeders are required to register annually with the Department of Health. This list will be published and made available to the public.

All breeders are required to furnish specified information to pet purchasers and provide a full refund for any reason for a pet returned within 14 days. Any dog which is sold with a pedigree can be returned for a full refund within 26 months if any congenital or genetic defects are discovered.
Have any of you read the complete bill?
The items I've quoted above don't sound too terrible so I'm wondering why the AKC is opposing it. Wouldn't a responsible breeder meet these standards anyway?
__________________

The reason a dog has so many friends; he wags his tail instead of his tongue
rmci is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 11:58 AM   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 137
Rep Power: 52 GoldenPup has a good dog forum reputation
I haven't read the complete bill...anyone know where to find it? I think this is the key in why the AKC is opposed :

"" The American Kennel Club opposes the concept of breeding permits, breeding bans or mandatory spay/neuter of purebred dogs. Instead, we support reasonable and enforceable laws that protect the welfare and health of purebred dogs and do not restrict the rights of breeders and owners who take their responsibilities seriously.""

GoldenPup
GoldenPup is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 03:19 PM   #4 (permalink)
Giant Schnauzers
 
bigdoglover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: West-Central Illinois
Posts: 3,624
Rep Power: 173 bigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forumbigdoglover user is more repute than ever in the dog forum
Send a message via Yahoo to bigdoglover
I have not read the complete bill, either......

However, as a breeder, some of the restrictions bother me....for example, keeping dogs/puppies on a non porous surface. To me this means concrete and nothing else.....now, you can ask any show person here....continuous concrete is bad on the feet and joints, and can cause calouses on the elbows. Personally, I have my pups/dogs (when they aren't in the house) in their runs that are filled with straw. I also have them out in grass, mud, concrete, gravel, etc. But never continuously on concrete.

Just one tidbit of my opinion. I have no problem with adhereing to standards, as I am so anal anyway, I think I am already complying!
__________________
Glory and Greed will destroy the breed.
bigdoglover is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dangerous Dog Bill Passes Va. House Crossfire Bulldogs Dog News and Dogs in Popular Media 0 02-08-2006 02:03 PM
Dangerous-dog bill too lenient to victim's kin Crossfire Bulldogs Dog News and Dogs in Popular Media 0 02-05-2006 02:35 AM
VT Ear Cropping Bill Moves Forward Crossfire Bulldogs Dog News and Dogs in Popular Media 0 02-03-2006 06:15 PM
Vicious dog bill approved DoozyDog Dog News and Dogs in Popular Media 3 01-28-2006 08:03 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2008 - Globalpaw.com Dog Forum

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110